There may be more paths forward than you’ve been told.
Too many patients hear “there’s nothing more we can do” — and stop looking. That’s exactly the moment the HIP exists for.
Clinical trials test treatments that aren’t available anywhere else yet — often for patients who don’t qualify for anything else. Even if a second or third opinion has left you without treatment options, you can ask your care team whether a clinical trial may be relevant.
Eligibility depends on your diagnosis, history, and location — the HIP team or your cardiologist can help you figure out if you qualify.
First, what is a clinical trial?
A clinical trial is a carefully supervised study of a treatment that is not yet available to everyone. It is not an experiment done to you. You are looked after by a full medical team, usually more closely than in ordinary care, and you can stop taking part at any point, for any reason.
Every trial has rules about who can join, based on your diagnosis, your history, and sometimes your age or where you live. That is why some people qualify and others do not. Taking part is free of charge for the treatment being studied.
For valve conditions that do not yet have an approved option, or for people who have been turned away everywhere else, a trial is sometimes the way to reach a treatment years before it is widely available.
Why We Keep This List
We keep track of these studies so you do not have to search through medical databases on your own.
Active, not recruitingNAACURATE IDE: Safety and Effectiveness Study of ACURATE Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Boston Scientific CorporationMultiple US sitesaortic
ACURATE IDE: Safety and Effectiveness Study of ACURATE Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
ACURATE IDE: Safety and Effectiveness Study of ACURATE Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the ACURATE Transfemoral Aortic Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in subjects with severe native aortic stenosis who are indicated for TAVR. As of 28-May-2025, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) announced the voluntary global discontinuation of the ACURATE product platform, including both the ACURATE neo2 and ACURATE Prime Aortic Valve Systems. BSC will no longer pursue regulatory approval for the device in the U.S. or other unapproved geographies.
- Who can join
- child, adult, older adult
- Participants
- 1948
- Expected completion
- 2029-09
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Stenosis
What it measures
- Composite Rate of All-cause Mortality, All Stroke, and Rehospitalization* at 1 Year in the Main Randomized Cohort., Primary Endpoint: A Clinical Events Committee (CEC), independent group of physician experts reviewed and adjudicated all reported cases of death, stroke and rehospitalization to determine whether they met the specific protocol definition of the event. The CEC adjudicated results are used in the endpoint analysis. \* Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV); per VARC-2 definition., Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay through 1 year.
Registry entry updated 2026-09-16
Active, not recruitingNAEvaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the EMBLOK EPS During TAVR
Emblok, Inc.Multiple US sitesaortic
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the EMBLOK EPS During TAVR
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of the EMBLOK EPS During TAVR
The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and performance of the EMBLOK EPS during TAVR by randomized comparison with a commercially available embolic protection device. The targeted study population consists of patients meeting FDA-approved indications for TAVR with commercially available transcatheter heart valve systems. This prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will enroll up to a total of 532 subjects undergoing TAVR at up to 30 investigational sites in the United States. All subjects will undergo clinical follow-up (including detailed neurological assessments) in-hospital and at 30 days.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 532
- Expected completion
- 2025-10-01
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Replacement, Aortic Valve Stenosis
What it measures
- Debris capture, defined as the average number of captured particles ≥150 µm in diameter, as assessed by independent histologic analysis, The co-primary filtration efficacy endpoint is debris capture, defined as the average number of captured particles ≥150 μm in diameter, as assessed by independent histologic analysis., Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure)
- Incidence of the composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke (disabling or non-disabling) and transient ischemic attack (TIA), and Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy), according to VARC-2 definitions, The primary safety and efficacy endpoint is combined safety and efficacy at 30 days, defined as a composite of the following VARC-2 defined components: * All-cause mortality * All stroke (disabling or non-disabling) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) * Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy), Evaluated at 30-day post-procedure (TAVR) follow-up visit
Working with
Yale Cardiovascular Research Group
Registry entry updated 2025-08-06
Active, not recruitingNAMedtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Low Risk Bicuspid Study
Medtronic CardiovascularMultiple US sitesaortic
Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Low Risk Bicuspid Study
Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Low Risk Bicuspid Study
The objective of the trial is to evaluate the procedural safety and efficacy of the Medtronic TAVR system in patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 150
- Expected completion
- 2030-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Bicuspid Aortic Valve
What it measures
- Efficacy: Percent of Participants Who Meet All Device Success Criteria at 30 Days Post-procedure., Device success rate, defined as: * Absence of procedural mortality, AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, AND * Absence of moderate or severe total prosthetic valve regurgitation (at 18 hours to 7 days), 7 days
- Safety: Percent of Participants With All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke Rate at 30 Days Post-procedure., Rate of of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke rate at 30 days, 30 days
Registry entry updated 2026-05-05
Active, not recruitingNASURTAVI
Medtronic CardiovascularMultiple US sitesaortic
SURTAVI
Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI).
The purpose of the study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe, symptomatic Aortic Stenosis (AS) at intermediate surgical risk by randomizing patients to either Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) or TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve® System. Single Arm: The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implementation (TAVI) in patients with severe symptomatic Aortic Stenosis (AS) at intermediate surgical risk with TAVI. This is a non-randomized phase of the pivotal clinical trial.
- Who can join
- child, adult, older adult
- Participants
- 1746
- Expected completion
- 2026-11
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Severe Aortic Stenosis
What it measures
- All-cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke Rate Expressed as a Posterior Probability, All-cause mortality: all deaths from any cause after valve intervention. This includes all cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Disabling Stroke: a modified rankin (mRS) score of 2 or more at 90 days and an increase in at least one mRS category from an individual's pre-strike baseline., 24 months
Registry entry updated 2026-06-24
Active, not recruitingNAEARLY TAVR
Edwards LifesciencesMultiple US sitesaortic
EARLY TAVR
EARLY TAVR: Evaluation of TAVR Compared to Surveillance for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3/SAPIEN 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) compared with clinical surveillance (CS) in asymptomatic patients with severe, calcific aortic stenosis.
- Who can join
- older adult
- Participants
- 901
- Expected completion
- 2032-03
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Stenosis, Severe, Heart Diseases
What it measures
- All-cause death, all stroke, and unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization, The number of patients that have any of these conditions, When all patients have reached 2-year follow-up
Registry entry updated 2024-05-13
Active, not recruitingNAEarly Feasibility Study (EFS) of Abbott's Balloon-expandable (BE) TAVI System for the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Abbott Medical DevicesMultiple US sitesaortic
Early Feasibility Study (EFS) of Abbott's Balloon-expandable (BE) TAVI System for the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Early Feasibility Study (EFS) of Abbott's Balloon-expandable (BE) TAVI System for the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and functionality of Abbott's BE TAVI system for the treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 11
- Expected completion
- 2031-06
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
What it measures
- Device success, Intended performance of the valve, 30 days
- Technical success, Successful access, delivery of the Abbott BE TAVI valve, and retrieval of the delivery system., From start of procedure up to end of procedure
Registry entry updated 2026-02-06
Active, not recruitingNAEarly Feasibility Study for the Foldax Tria Aortic Heart Valve
Foldax, IncMultiple US sitesaortic
Early Feasibility Study for the Foldax Tria Aortic Heart Valve
Early Feasibility Study for the Foldax Tria Aortic Heart Valve
The purpose of this study is to conduct the initial clinical investigation of the Foldax Polymer Aortic Valve to collect evidence on the device's safety and performance. The study is anticipated to confirm successful clinical safety and clinical effectiveness with significant improvements in clinical hemodynamic performance.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 40
- Expected completion
- 2026-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
What it measures
- Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Hemodynamic Performance Assessment, Hemodynamic performance parameters are mmHG mean gradient and derived Effective Orifice Area (EOA). Success is defined as clinically significant improvement in hemodynamic performance (Effective Orifice Area (EOA)) at one year based on literature reports for surgical aortic valve replacement., 12 months following patient enrollment completion
- Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: New York Heart Association Improvement Assessment, Clinically significant improvement (one grade) in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification status at 365 days compared to baseline. a. Class I - No symptoms and no limitations in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. b. Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. c. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100m). Comfortable only at rest. d. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients., 12 months following patient enrollment completion
- Primary Safety Endpoints: Objective Performance Criteria for Flexible Heart Valve Events Assessments, The adverse events consistent with the Objective Performance Criteria (OPC), for flexible heart valves will be compared to those rates defined as acceptable levels in the standard. a. Thromboembolism b. Valve Thrombosis c. Major Paravalvular leak d. Major Hemorrhage e. Endocarditis, 12 months following patient enrollment completion
- Primary Safety Endpoints: Surgical Valve Events Rate Assessment, The rates of other events will be compared to clinical outcomes for surgically implanted heart valves reported in the literature. a. All-caused death b. Valve related death c. Valve-related reoperation d. Valve explant e. Hemorrhage f. All-cause reoperation g. Valve-related death, 12 months following patient enrollment completion
Registry entry updated 2023-09-13
Active, not recruitingNAEvolut™ EXPAND TAVR II Pivotal Trial
Medtronic CardiovascularMultiple US sitesaortic
Evolut™ EXPAND TAVR II Pivotal Trial
Evolut™ EXPAND TAVR II Pivotal Trial
Obtain safety and effectiveness data to support indication expansion for the Medtronic TAVR System to include patients with moderate, AS.
- Who can join
- older adult
- Participants
- 650
- Expected completion
- 2034-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Moderate Aortic Valve Stenosis
What it measures
- Composite rate of all-cause mortality, all-stroke, life threatening or fatal bleeding, acute kidney injury, hospitalization due to device or procedure-related complication, or valve dysfunction requiring reintervention., Life threatening or fatal bleeding is defined as BARC Type 3 or 4 and acute kidney injury is defined as VARC-3 Stage IV., 30 days
- Composite rate of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization or event, or medical instability leading to aortic valve replacement or re-intervention., 2 years
Registry entry updated 2026-05-19
Active, not recruitingNAExCEED: CENTERA THV System in Intermediate Risk Patients Who Have Symptomatic, Severe, Calcific, Aortic Stenosis
Edwards LifesciencesMultiple US sitesaortic
ExCEED: CENTERA THV System in Intermediate Risk Patients Who Have Symptomatic, Severe, Calcific, Aortic Stenosis
ExCEED: CENTERA THV System in Intermediate Risk Patients Who Have Symptomatic, Severe, Calcific, Aortic Stenosis
This study will monitor the safety and valve performance of the Edwards CENTERA Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) System in patients with symptomatic, severe, calcific aortic stenosis who are at intermediate operative risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
- Who can join
- child, adult, older adult
- Participants
- 101
- Expected completion
- 2030-07
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Valve Stenosis
What it measures
- All-cause Death, Number of participants that died, 1 year
Registry entry updated 2025-11-13
Active, not recruitingNAJVTF EFS
JC Medical, Inc., an affiliate of Edwards Lifesciences LLCMultiple US sitesaortic
JVTF EFS
J-Valve TF Early Feasibility Study
The main objective of this study is to assess the preliminary safety and effectiveness of the J-Valve TF System in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic regurgitation who are judged by a multi-disciplinary heart team to be eligible for the device and to be at high risk for open surgical aortic valve replacement.
- Who can join
- child, adult, older adult
- Participants
- 25
- Expected completion
- 2029-08-25
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
What it measures
- Number of patients that do not experience death or disabling stroke, Freedom from death or disabling stroke Disabling stroke is evaluated using a standardized scale, 30 days after the valve procedure
Registry entry updated 2025-07-11
Active, not recruitingNAMedtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients
Medtronic CardiovascularMultiple US sitesaortic
Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients
Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients
The study objective is to demonstrate that the safety and effectiveness of the Medtronic TAVR system as measured by rates of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at two years is noninferior to SAVR in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in subjects who have a low predicted risk of operative mortality for SAVR. The purpose of the expanded use addendum to the Medtronic TAVR in Low Risk Patients Trial protocol is to conclude the randomized phase of the trial and initiate the single-arm, non-randomized, continued access phase of the trial.
- Who can join
- child, adult, older adult
- Participants
- 2223
- Expected completion
- 2029-06
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Valve Stenosis
What it measures
- Safety: All Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke Rate at 24 Months, Randomized Controlled Trial Safety: All Cause Mortality or All Stroke Rate at 12 Months, Continued Access Study, Assessment of procedural safety by: All-cause mortality: all deaths from any cause after valve intervention. This includes all cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. Disabling stroke: a modified rankin score (mRS) of 2 or more at 90 days post-stroke and an increase of at least one mRS category from an individual's pre-stroke baseline. All stroke: any stroke after valve intervention (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or undetermined stroke)., Randomized Controlled Trial - 24 months Continued Access Study - 12 months
Registry entry updated 2026-05-07
Active, not recruitingNAP3
Edwards LifesciencesMultiple US sitesaortic
P3
PARTNER 3 Trial: Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
To establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) in patients with severe, calcific aortic stenosis who are at low operative risk for standard aortic valve replacement.
- Who can join
- child, adult, older adult
- Participants
- 1000
- Expected completion
- 2029-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Stenosis
What it measures
- All-cause Mortality, All Stroke, and Rehospitalization (Valve-related or Procedure-related and Including Heart Failure), Number of patients that had any of these events, 1 year
Registry entry updated 2026-01-14
Active, not recruitingNAPortico Next Generation Approval Study
Abbott Medical DevicesMultiple US sitesaortic
Portico Next Generation Approval Study
Portico Next Generation Approval Study
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the acute safety and effectiveness of the next-generation Navitor (Portico™ NG) Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve as assessed by the rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days and the rate of moderate or greater paravalvular leak at 30 days in a high or extreme surgical risk patient population to support CE (Conformité Européenne) Mark and FDA approval.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 333
- Expected completion
- 2033-01
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
What it measures
- Primary Effectiveness Endpoint is Moderate or Greater Paravalvular Leak, Number of participants with moderate or greater paravalvular leak at 30 days., at 30 days
- Primary Safety Endpoint is All-cause Mortality, All-cause mortality is defined as the total number of deaths in each cohort at 30 days., at 30 days
Registry entry updated 2026-07-21
Active, not recruitingNAPORTICO-IDE
Abbott Medical DevicesMultiple US sitesaortic
PORTICO-IDE
Portico Re-sheathable Transcatheter Aortic Valve System US IDE Trial
The objective of the PORTICO pivotal IDE trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the St Jude Medical (SJM) Portico Transcatheter Heart Valve and Delivery Systems (Portico) in the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis via transfemoral and alternative delivery methods in high risk and extreme risk patients.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 1242
- Expected completion
- 2026-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Valve Stenosis
What it measures
- Percentage of Patients With Major Vascular Complications (Primary Safety Endpoint- FlexNav Delivery System Study), Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) 2- defined major vascular complications, 30 days from index procedure
- Primary Effectiveness Endpoint (Randomized IDE Cohort), A composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at one year., One-year from randomization
- Primary Safety Endpoint (Randomized IDE Cohort), Non-hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, life threatening bleeding requiring blood transfusion, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, or major vascular complications at 30 days., 30 days from randomization
Registry entry updated 2025-07-20
Active, not recruitingNASMART
Medtronic CardiovascularMultiple US sitesaortic
SMART
SMall Annuli Randomized To Evolut™ or SAPIEN™ Trial
The purpose of this trial is to generate clinical evidence on valve safety and performance of self-expanding (SE) versus balloon-expandable (BE) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in subjects with a small aortic annulus and symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis. Additionally, a stress echocardiography sub-study will be conducted as part of the SMART Trial at select sites. The purpose of the sub-study is to evaluate performance of SE versus BE TAVR in subjects with a small aortic annulus and symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis after undergoing exercise stress echocardiographic testing.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 1103
- Expected completion
- 2027-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Valve Replacement, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
What it measures
- Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction (BVD), Percentage of participants with BVD as determined by echocardiography (hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction (aortic valve no longer works properly as measured by hemodynamic mean gradient ≥ 20mmHg), non-structural valve dysfunction (severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (valve is too small) and/or ≥ moderate total aortic regurgitation (backward flow of blood)), thrombosis (formation of a blood clot), endocarditis (inflammation of the endocardium - the inner lining of the heart chambers and valves), or aortic valve re-intervention (a follow-up procedure to fix or replace the aortic prosthetic valve)), 12 months
- Mortality, Disabling Stroke or Heart Failure Rehospitalization, Percentage of participants with all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization., 12 months
Registry entry updated 2026-06-02
Active, not recruitingNASiegel™ Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System (TAVR) Early Feasibility Study
MiRusMultiple US sitesaortic
Siegel™ Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System (TAVR) Early Feasibility Study
Siegel™ Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System (TAVR) Early Feasibility Study
The Siegel™ Transcatheter Aortic Valve (TAVR) early feasibility study objective is to assess the acute and long-term safety and feasibility of the Siegel TAVR device in adult subjects with symptomatic, severe native aortic stenosis eligible for the transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 30
- Expected completion
- 2025-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Stenosis Symptomatic
What it measures
- All-cause mortality or disabling stroke, Mortality will be reported as rate of death/mortality at 30 days. Disabling stroke will be reported according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) Guidelines, 30 Days
- Technical success of implantation of the Siegel TAVR, Technical success will be reported as freedom from mortality, successful device implant, and freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device., Immediate post procedure
Registry entry updated 2025-12-03
Active, not recruitingNATHE ALIGN-AR EFS TRIAL: JenaValve Pericardial TAVR Aortic Regurgitation Study
JenaValve Technology, Inc.Multiple US sitesaortic
THE ALIGN-AR EFS TRIAL: JenaValve Pericardial TAVR Aortic Regurgitation Study
THE ALIGN-AR EFS TRIAL: JenaValve Pericardial TAVR Aortic Regurgitation Study
To collect information about treatment for severe Aortic Regurgitation (AR), which affects the aortic valve in the heart. Aortic regurgitation is a condition where aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly and allows some blood to leak back into the heart chamber. Symptoms of aortic regurgitation may include fatigue and shortness of breath. The preferred treatment for severe aortic regurgitation is aortic valve replacement surgery.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 100
- Expected completion
- 2027-09-29
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Regurgitation
What it measures
- All-Cause Mortality at 30 days, All-Cause mortality within the first 30 days post index procedure, 30 days
Registry entry updated 2022-11-18
Active, not recruitingNAJENA-VAD
JenaValve Technology, Inc.Multiple US sitesaortic
JENA-VAD
The JenaValve ALIGN-AR LVAD Registry
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the JenaValve Trilogy™ Heart Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in subjects with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (cfLVAD) and clinically significant aortic regurgitation (AR) who are indicated for TAVR
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 50
- Expected completion
- 2027-08
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Left Ventricular Dysfunction
What it measures
- Acute Kidney Injury, Number of patients that had acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3 or 4, 30 days
- All Stroke, Number of patients that had stroke, 30 days
- All-cause mortality, All-cause mortality within the first 30 days post index procedure, 30 days
- Bleeding, Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding, 30 days
- Device Performance, Intended performance of the valve (i.e., no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)\*, 30 days
- Device Positioning, Freedom from incorrect positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, 30 days
- Device Success, Freedom from unsuccessful delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system, 30 days
- Major Vascular Complication, Number of patients that had major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication, 30 days
- Permanent pacemaker implantation, Number of patients that had these events, 30 days
- Surgery/intervention related to device, Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device# or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication, 30 days
- Total aortic regurgitation, Number of patients that had moderate or severe total aortic regurgitation, 30 days
Registry entry updated 2026-07-22
Active, not recruitingNAALIGN-AR
JenaValve Technology, Inc.Multiple US sitesaortic
ALIGN-AR
The JenaValve ALIGN-AR Pivotal Trial
To collect information about treatment for symptomatic severe Aortic Regurgitation (AR), which affects the aortic valve in the heart. Aortic regurgitation is a condition where aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly and allows some blood to leak back into the heart chamber. Symptoms of aortic regurgitation may include fatigue and shortness of breath. The preferred treatment for severe aortic regurgitation is aortic valve replacement surgery.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 180
- Expected completion
- 2028-08
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
What it measures
- Acute Kidney Injury, Number of patients that had these events, 30 days
- All Stroke, Number of patients that had a stroke, 30 days
- All-Cause Mortality at 1 Year, All-cause mortality within the first 12 months post index procedure, 1 year
- Major Bleeding, Number of patients that had any of these events, 30 days
- Major Vascular Complications, Number of patients that had these events, 30 days
- Permanent pacemaker implantation, Number of patients that had these events, 30 days
- Surgery/intervention related to the device, Number of patients that had these events, 30 days
- Total aortic regurgitation, Number of patients that had these events, 30 days
Registry entry updated 2022-09-13
Active, not recruitingNATranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left Ventricle in Patients With ADvanced Heart Failure (TAVR UNLOAD)
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New YorkMultiple US sitesaortic
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left Ventricle in Patients With ADvanced Heart Failure (TAVR UNLOAD)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left Ventricle in Patients With ADvanced Heart Failure (TAVR UNLOAD)
The objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via a transfemoral approach in HF patients with moderate AS as compared with OHFT.
- Who can join
- adult, older adult
- Participants
- 178
- Expected completion
- 2025-02
- Funded by
- other
Conditions studied
Aortic Valve Stenosis
What it measures
- All-Cause Death, Hierarchical occurrence within efficacy assessment time interval (EATI) of:, 12 months
- Change in KCCQ relative to baseline, Hierarchical occurrence within efficacy assessment time interval (EATI) of:, 12 months
- Disabling Stroke, Hierarchical occurrence within efficacy assessment time interval (EATI) of:, 12 months
- Hospitalizations related to heart failure, symptomatic aortic valve disease or non-disabling stroke -or - Clinically significant worsening of heart failure (heart failure hospitalization equivalent)., Hierarchical occurrence within efficacy assessment time interval (EATI) of:, 12 months
Working with
Avania, Cardialysis BV
Registry entry updated 2024-11-27
Active, not recruitingNADurAVR™ EFS
Anteris Technologies Ltd.Multiple US sitesaortic
DurAVR™ EFS
Use of DurAVR™ THV System in Subjects With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Early Feasibility Study
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of DurAVR™ THV System in the treatment of subjects with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis.
- Who can join
- older adult
- Participants
- 15
- Expected completion
- 2033-12
- Funded by
- industry
Conditions studied
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Calcification, Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
What it measures
- All-cause mortality or disabling stroke, Mortality would be reported as rate of death/mortality at 30 days. Disabling stroke would be reported according to VARC-3 Guidelines, 30days
- Technical success, Freedom from mortality, successful device implant, and freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device., Immediate post procedure
Registry entry updated 2026-06-26